the ability to deactivate IPv6 connections, and set proxy servers independedntly from the operating system. įirefox has unique system-independent developer-relevant features in about:config and elsewhere which Google Chrome lacks, e.g. And workarounds Chrome mobile has through remote debugging are pure. This would make it impossible to, for example, export browsing sessions to a file to prevent tab hoarding. If they had a monopoly, they likely would. I would not be surprised if Google outright ends support for all browser extensions. If Google becomes a browsing monopoly, desktop browsers might also have this restriction unless paid for YouTube Premium. Ah yes, also get ready to kiss open-source Chromium good-bye.Īlso, in April 2019, they threatened to delete Kiwi Browser from Google Play store if they don't comply with the request to disallow background playback of YouTube videos.
#Why wont chrome browser download apple itunes android
Google will make file manager devs submit a form to get broad file storage access in Android 11 – Sounds terrible? If Firefox gets out of the way, get ready for such tyranny on web standards.We have already seen where this leads to with Android OS: Storage access has increasingly be crippled (absurd restrictions supported by fearmongering "security reasons" instead of options for the user), starting with Android 4.4's non-optional MicroSD write protection, Google "Storage Access Framework", and then scoped storage. Firefox is all that stands between it taking over the web with disastrous consequences. If need-be, user interests get tossed under the bus. Posted from throwaway account because one of my real-life friends works at Google.